Website
Entire Site ...
Affirmative Action
Building Services
City Controller
City Council
City Secretary
Conventions
Courts
Español
Finance & Admin
Fire
Health Services
Housing
HR
Info Technology
Legal
Mayor
Parks
Planning
Police
Solid Waste
My ZIP Code
77002
77003
77004
77005
77006
77007
77008
77009
77010
77011
77012
77013
77014
77015
77016
77017
77018
77019
77020
77021
77022
77023
77024
77025
77026
77027
77028
77029
77030
77031
77032
77033
77034
77035
77036
77037
77038
77039
77040
77041
77042
77043
77044
77045
77046
77047
77048
77049
77050
77051
77052
77053
77054
77055
77056
77057
77058
77059
77060
77061
77062
77063
77064
77065
77066
77067
77068
77069
77070
77071
77072
77073
77074
77075
77076
77077
77078
77079
77080
77081
77082
77083
77084
77085
77086
77087
77088
77089
77090
77091
77092
77093
77094
77095
77096
77097
77098
77099
77336
77338
77339
77345
77365
77396
77489
77504
77598
Public Works and Engineering >Planning and Development Services Division
Home
|
FAQ
Plan Check Comment Information
Project Number:
07042588
Description:
SITEWORK AND FOUNDATION FOR FUTURE 23 STORY HIGH RISE CONDO
Address:
1717 BISSONNET ST
COMMENTS:
2/13/09 DRIVEWAY PERMIT COMMENTS FROM CITY ENGINEER, MARK L. LOETHEN, P.E.
PLANS WERE RESUBMITTED FOLLOWING COMMENTS FROM CITY ENGINEER ON 9/29/08.
RESUBMITTED PLAN SET ON 1/27/09 INCLUDES REVISIONS BY APPLICANT TO PLAN SETS
PREVIOUSLY REJECTED AND A NEW TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (TIA) DATED JANUARY
2009.
FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE PROVIDED REGARDING LATEST PLAN SUBMITTAL AND SHOULD BE
ADDRESSED:
1. SITE PLAN HAS BEEN REVISED TO REFLECT GATED EMERGENCY ACCESS DRIVEWAY
TO ASHBY. ALL OTHER ENTERING/EXITING TRAFFIC IS PROPOSED VIA A SINGLE
DRIVEWAY TO BISSONNET.
2. CONFLICTS IN DRAWING SET EXIST BETWEEN REVISED SITE PLAN A001 AND THE
FOLLOWING DRAWINGS:
A. G005 CODE PLAN
B. C102-C105 DRIVEWAY, GRADING, DRAINAGE AND STORMWATER QUALITY
FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE PROVIDED REGARDING JANUARY 2009 TIA AND SHOULD BE
ADDRESSED:
1. NO SITE PLAN WAS INCLUDED WITH THE TIA TO SUPPORT THE ANALYSIS.
2. SYNCHRO OUTPUT AND CAPACITY DATA FOR THE BISSONNET DRIVEWAY IS NOT
INCLUDED IN THE APPENDIX AS INDICATED IN THE TEXT OF THE REPORT.
3. NO AM PEAK ANALYSIS WAS PRESENTED NOR EXPLANATION REGARDING ITS
OMISSION FROM THE STUDY.
4. PROVIDE A FIGURE IN REPORT THAT SHOWS THE TRIPS GENERATED AT EACH
INTERSECTION AND DRIVEWAY IN THE ANALYSIS.
5. PROVIDE REFERENCE TO SUPPORT STATEMENT (PG 12) THAT HCM (HIGHWAY
CAPACITY MANUAL) RECOMMENDS USING SIMULATION TO EVALUATE UNSIGNALIZED
INTERSECTIONS.
6. QUEUE DATA NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED IN THE TIA. SIM TRAFFIC OUTPUT IN
APPENDIX SHOWS 95TH QUEUE OF 244 FEET FOR EBL FROM BISSSONNET TO DUNLAVY AND
A 95TH QUEUE OF 225 FEET FOR WBL FROM BISSONNET INTO PROJECT DRIVEWAY.
REPORT INDICATES DISTANCE BETWEEN PROPOSED DRIVEWAY AND DUNLAVY INTERSECTION
OF 250 FEET. HOW WILL BISSONNET BE ABLE TO SUPPORT SIMULTANEOUS STACKING IN
SAME AREA?
7. TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS INDICATE 10 TRIPS FOR 6,700 SF OF OFFICE
SPACE WHICH IS EQUIVALENT TO 670 SF PER EMPLOYEE. IS THIS REALISTIC FOR
HOUSTON OFFICE MARKET?
8. TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS INDICATE 184 PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS
(ENTERING AND EXITING) FOR 231 RESIDENTIAL UNITS. BASED UPON SPLIT IN
REPORT, 98 ENTERING AND 86 EXITING VEHICLES. IS THIS APPLICATION OF ITE
RATES REALISTIC FOR HOUSTON HOUSING MARKET?
9. ITE TRIP GENERATION TABLES PROVIDE RECOMMENDED PROCEDURES FOR
ESTIMATING TRIP GENERATION. PLEASE REVIEW YOUR CALCULATIONS TO ENSURE THAT
RATES AND DATA ARE APPLICABLE FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT SITE.